Here's that clear write-up for you: " A Region may be designated PG if it does not advertise or make available content or activity that's sexually explicit, violent or depicts nudity. In fact, the definition of PG has not actually changed, and this is written up more clearly now." However, what constitutes PG, says the Lab, has not changed, "ew PG guidelines appeared to be much more strict than our previous PG classification. Searching through the knowledge-base could easily turn up between 3 and 5 conflicting definitions at any time. Second Life's PG rating has always been something of a minefield of contradictory definitions, policy-statements and documents. The PG rating holds a couple of surprises, though. It appears that all the changes have been simple explanatory wording changes. There's some outstanding issues with the viewer release-candidates, but it seems fairly low on actual showstoppers and looks likely to make an official release in the roughly one fortnight remaining.ĭefinitions for the content ratings have been finalized, though they show little noticeable deviation from Linden Lab's originally proposed drafts. The 1.23 Second Lifeviewer with the necessary support for Adult content is still being rushed to meet a June deadline, the exact reason for which seems a little unclear.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |